Author Topic: Psych theories tangent from Brando Skyhorse Review thread  (Read 9857 times)

Offline Sturmboe

  • Posts: 117
Psych theories tangent from Brando Skyhorse Review thread
« on: August 10, 2014, 09:29:07 am »
x
« Last Edit: September 04, 2014, 03:57:02 am by Sturmboe »

Offline Diana

  • Posts: 436
  • I Love YaBB 2!
Re: Psych theories tangent from
« Reply #1 on: August 25, 2014, 01:47:02 am »
I read this book for one third now. Speaking for myself: I do not see how this book would help me understand why people would want to be famous, or world saviours, or Masters, or The-One-Who-Knows-It-All.

A quote from the book, page 21:
Quote
[My mother] could be leading a group of wide-eyed "Pilgrims" - my mother's term for whites - around a jewelry store rubbing 'southwestern' squash blossom necklaces and sterling silver bracelets between her fingers. Using a just-for-white-people "Indian" voice - a taffy pull on her slight Latina accent - she'd pronounce whether a piece of turquoise had been crafted by a real "on the rez Skin".
Of course, my mother had no idea which pieces were authentic, but if her details didn't line up - or connect at all - you still wanted to believe her. Why? You felt privileged that someone with such an extraordinary story would choose to confide in, of all people, you. You'd forget meeting a hundred people, but you'd remember meeting my mother. Her story became your story.
"I can't wait to tell my friends I met an Indian!" one of my mother's Pilgrims told her in a sincere embrace. She rattled with her jewelry my mother had helped her buy. "Thank you."

It is a bit like the theme:
Who decides what is the meaning of symbols?
In this case, a Latina nitwit tells white nitwits what is 'real NDN jewelry'. And they love it!


@ limetree, I have no idea what your babbling about???? Famous? Saviors? Masters? WTF! Did you even read the book? Look limetree if you can't write a somewhat coherent sentence or post, please don't.

As usual you sound ridiculous. I know when you want to you have the ability to write clearly and effectively. So please stop with the gobbledygook. Your insulting.


Diana

Offline Lime Tree

  • Posts: 27
Re: Psych theories tangent from
« Reply #2 on: August 25, 2014, 10:33:02 pm »
Diana,

From your original post I understood that you hoped to get a better understanding of plastic shamans.
The reason I'm posting this, his experience mirrors a lot of the frauds we investigate and write about.     . . .   
I truly believe most of these frauds are emotional cripples with undiagnosed psychosis. Which is why I am going to read this book to get a better handle on these people we report about.

With "people that want to be famous, or world saviours, or Masters, or The-One-Who-Knows-It-All" I mean the people that give themselves names that sound good, taught workshops on world changes on December 21st of 2012, reiki masters, and such.

I read the book till page 93. Then I decided, that it would not help me to understand new-agers. If it helps you, that is fine.

Now that I think of it, I see a parallel between the confrontation with a psychotic person on the one hand, and the confrontation with a new age leader on the other hand.
With a psychotic person, it takes strength and faith and clarity, to simply look and to allow that person to be who he is. It takes a strength to open up a bit to that person.
With a new age leader, it takes strength and faith and clarity, to not allow that person to come in to you, to keep standing on your own feet.

So, the psychotic has fantasies and delusions that you do not want.
The seduction of the new age leader is that he has fantasies and delusions that you do want. - Well, not you Diana, but those who follow them.

Does this sound like gobbledygook?

I had a confrontation with Robin Youngblood a year ago. I told her, that giving hope was only part of life, and you cannot pray and only invite hope. (That is one-sided, in my view. But that is not the point.) We were sitting in a circle, but now she walked up to me and said something like: "I am sorry if I did not express myself clearly - I was speaking about trust, not hope." I felt that as an attempt to overpower me. Two friends that I spoke later on the phone were impressed by her act - they saw it as an apology. So at the same time that she came to me to tame me, she seduced others. By the same act. Quite a feature. (Of course my view might be wrong, but that is how I see it.)
I tell this as an illustration, to make clear the difference between the fear-giving madness of the psychotic person an de hope-giving delusion of the new age leader.

Offline Diana

  • Posts: 436
  • I Love YaBB 2!
Re: Psych theories tangent from
« Reply #3 on: August 26, 2014, 04:36:38 am »
Quote
From your original post I understood that you hoped to get a better understanding of plastic shamans.

Who said anything about this book being about plastic shamans? Did you even read any of the posts?? It's very clear "we" were talking about Brando Skyhorse's new book, where his Mother mascaraed as an Indian and the lengths she went through to keep this identity. She also convinced her son Brando that he was Indian too.

The reason I'm posting this, his experience mirrors a lot of the frauds we investigate and write about.     . . .   
I truly believe most of these frauds are emotional cripples with undiagnosed psychosis. Which is why I am going to read this book to get a better handle on these people we report about.

Yes, I wrote that, what about it? What part of this paragraph don't you understand?

Quote
With "people that want to be famous, or world saviours, or Masters, or The-One-Who-Knows-It-All" I mean the people that give themselves names that sound good, taught workshops on world changes on December 21st of 2012, reiki masters, and such.

Again it's not about plastic shamans so this is a moot point.

Quote
I read the book till page 93. Then I decided, that it would not help me to understand new-agers. If it helps you, that is fine.

It doesn't help you understand "newagers" because "you" are one!

Quote
Now that I think of it, I see a parallel between the confrontation with a psychotic person on the one hand, and the confrontation with a new age leader on the other hand.
With a psychotic person, it takes strength and faith and clarity, to simply look and to allow that person to be who he is. It takes a strength to open up a bit to that person.
With a new age leader, it takes strength and faith and clarity, to not allow that person to come in to you, to keep standing on your own feet.

So, the psychotic has fantasies and delusions that you do not want.
The seduction of the new age leader is that he has fantasies and delusions that you do want. - Well, not you Diana, but those who follow them.

I don't even know how to respond to that. It means nothing to me.

Quote
I had a confrontation with Robin Youngblood a year ago

I really don't know who she is nor do I care. I had to google her and also looked her up on NAFPS. Again it means nothing to me. I don't see how this is relevant

Quote
So at the same time that she came to me to tame me, she seduced others. By the same act. Quite a feature.

That's just a creepy comment.

I know you are deliberately insulting all of us or maybe just me. I also know that book hit a nerve with you. And I think you know why.


Diana
« Last Edit: August 26, 2014, 04:39:11 am by Diana »

Offline Sturmboe

  • Posts: 117
Re: Psych theories tangent from
« Reply #4 on: August 26, 2014, 03:09:58 pm »
x
« Last Edit: September 04, 2014, 03:56:28 am by Sturmboe »

Offline Defend the Sacred

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 3290
Re: Psych theories tangent from Brando Skyhorse Review thread
« Reply #5 on: August 26, 2014, 09:13:27 pm »
Sturmboe, Diana does not need you to explain what Lime Tree was saying. Frankly, I agree with her that you are both (Lime Tree And Sturmboe) being confusing and the whole thing feels like derailment. It's not just the language barrier. Neither of you have (fully) read the book, and once again you are just randomly opining at length on tangential issues. Whether or not you intend to come off condescending, entitled or insulting, you are being perceived that way.

This is a predominantly Native forum, and our key issue here is the appropriation/exploitation of Native cultures. We deal with other issues as well, but when it turns into white people theorizing about material they haven't even read, some of us start to feel uncomfortable. We white people are guests here, and need to remember that.

I am putting on my mod hat here and asking both of you - Lime Tree and Sturmboe - to really think things through before you post, and then ask yourselves whether what you want to say really advances our work here. If you just want to talk about your personal theories about nuagers, psychology, psychiatry, etc, please either post it in this thread, or start a new thread in etc, or even better, start a blog and post your opinions there. 

*Edited because, since I split it off, this is now that thread.*
« Last Edit: August 26, 2014, 09:31:51 pm by Kathryn »

Offline Diana

  • Posts: 436
  • I Love YaBB 2!
Re: Psych theories tangent from Brando Skyhorse Review thread
« Reply #6 on: September 18, 2014, 08:09:55 pm »
Beware of Ethnic Imposters

Donna Ennis


http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/2014/09/15/beware-ethnic-imposters


Many of us are familiar with people of color trying to “pass” as white people perhaps to indulge in some White Privilege that they have heard so much about or maybe because being a person of color was a death sentence. Whatever the reason ethnic imposters have been around for hundreds of years.

During slavery times a light-skinned African American was envied because of one’s ability to move about the country more freely. During the Holocaust many Jewish people whom had Aryan features had their lives spared as they were able to study Christianity and “pass” as a non-Jew. My own mother, and her siblings, although Native in appearance, were able to “pass” as white people simply by lowering their blood quantum and practicing dominant culture ways of living.

Although much has been written about “passing” as a white person there are also instances of people moving in the other direction, away from whiteness. A reasonable person would need to ask themselves why a privileged person would want to experience the oppression of an ethnic identity. The answer lies in their ability to re enter the world they have left only temporarily.

Asa Earl Carter used the pseudonym, Forrest Carter to write the novel The Education of Little Tree purportedly about his experience being raised by his Cherokee grandparents in the 1920’s. The book was published in 1976 and was later revealed to be a literary hoax and Asa Earl Carter was revealed as a White supremacist and a member of the KKK in Alabama.

In the 1930’s, Archie Bellamy, assumed the Native American identity of Grey Owl, to carry on a conservation message. It is said that his work saved the Canadian beaver from extinction. His British origins, his subsequent migration to Canada and his career move from trapper to conservationist were discovered upon his death.

In 1948, Ray Sprigle, a journalist disguised himself as an African American man and wrote a series of articles entitled I was a Negro in the South for 30 Days.

Black Like Me is a book written by the journalist John Howard Griffin and published in 1961. In the book he describes his experience traveling throughout the racially segregated south of the 50’s and passing as an African American man.

For decades, Iron Eyes Cody, portrayed Native Americans on film and on television, claiming to be of Cree-Cherokee heritage. Even after it was revealed that he was an Italian immigrant named Espira DiCorti he continued the ruse until his death.

Ethnic imposters have evolved over the years and it is no longer politically correct for a White person to impersonate an African American person. However it does seem to go unchallenged and accepted for a White person to impersonate a Native American. New Age “spiritual” Native Americans, shamanism, and cultural appropriation are just a few examples of modern ethnic imposters. There is an obvious monetary gain for those that exploit Native culture in this way.

There is another, more sinister, type of imposter. In many communities ethnic imposters are often mentally ill people who have borderline personality traits that adopt values, habits and attitudes of the Native people that they spend time with. There may or may not be a monetary value in this practice but there is something else to be gained by these ethnic imposters. These individuals have a significant and persistent unstable self-image or sense of self and present as righteous avengers of past mistreatment. Nobody has been more mistreated then Native Americans (in the individuals thinking) and so these individuals take on the persona, often change their name to something Native sounding and reinvent themselves. Soon the individuals are assuming leadership roles in the political or activist realm which takes away from legitimate Native voices which are often ignored or silenced by the media.

Traditionally Native American people don’t challenge others’ claim to be Native as it is thought to be harmless but it is important that ethnic imposters be challenged on cultural appropriation on all levels because culture is the only thing remaining after colonization has stripped everything else away.

Donna Ennis is employed in the Behavioral Health Program and is a Tribal Elder at Fond du Lac Reservation. She is on the Board of Directors for the Minnesota Board of Social Work. She is also on the Approved Continuing Education Committee for the Association of Social Work Boards.


Read more at http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/2014/09/15/beware-ethnic-imposters