Exactly!,You do not have to agree with what Baylis said,how they said it or even the legal "point" being made(real or imagined)Nor am i defending Baylis.....What i am saying is think carefully before you use words like fraud around third parties.Most certainly if the Attorney in question may not have even known about what is or is not being said/written.I am only urging caution,discount what Baylis has to say by all means,thats your right,but the qualification is a bone fide one.Think about that guys please,thats all i am asking you to do.