"Fair Use" does not include the right to copy an entire website and make spiteful comments.
Examples of activities that courts have regarded as fair use:
“quotation of excerpts in a review or criticism for purposes of illustration or comment;
quotation of short passages in a scholarly or technical work,
for illustration or clarification of the author’s observations;
use in a parody of some of the content of the work parodied;
summary of an address or article, with brief quotations, in a news report;
reproduction by a library of a portion of a work to replace part of a damaged copy;
reproduction by a teacher or student of a small part of a work to illustrate a lesson;
reproduction of a work in legislative or judicial proceedings or reports;
incidental and fortuitous reproduction, in a newsreel or broadcast, of a work located in the scene of an event being reported.”
Copyright protects the particular way an author has expressed himself. It does not extend to any ideas, systems, or factual information conveyed in the work.
The safest course is always to get permission from the copyright owner before using copyrighted material. The Copyright Office cannot give this permission.
When it is impracticable to obtain permission, use of copyrighted material should be avoided unless the doctrine of fair use would clearly apply to the situation. The Copyright Office can neither determine if a certain use may be considered fair nor advise on possible copyright violations. If there is any doubt, it is advisable to consult an attorney.
http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl102.htmlOne final time BLS did not ask permission to copy my webpage and Bls may not use it. The continued malicious intent that this editor is making constantly is detracting from this conversation.
