Massey has just contacted me several times. He's said some very remarkable things:
1. He no longer does the teachings he used to.
2. He regrets doing so.
3. He would like to apologize for any and all harm or offense he's done.
Checking his website, what he once did that was objectionable is no longer on there. So the question becomes, what do we do next? He asked for the thread to be removed, but I would argue we move it to Archives marked No Longer a Matter of Concern.
Here's his apology, in his own words, in two emails.
------------------------
Hello – my attention was drawn to your website, and a thread -
http://www.newagefraud.org/smf/index.php?topic=209.0 - in your forum (2005) that referred to me.
You will see from my website that I do not claim to run sweatlodges, and that I do not teach Medicine Wheels. I can say with a clear conscience that I have never claimed to be a shaman, despite the subject heading and comments by the writer on your website.
When your writer contacted me all those years ago, I answered in good faith to what I thought was an open and straight approach from them. Like many, I have worked to find and build community, to search for spiritual meaning and sustenance. I have drawn upon what was available to me at the time. Your writers have made it clear that they believe this to have been misguided on my part.
If I have offended those in your group, I apologise. I did not mean to dishonour you or your traditions. If your writers had contacted me at the time, and engaged with me to point out in what way I was offending them and their traditions, and just plain ‘getting it wrong’ and requested or advised me to reconsider the work I was doing at that time, I would have found that helpful, and would have taken such an approach seriously. It is helpful to learn from those who know more, or better, than I do.
I personally believe that in the UK, for centuries we have lost spiritual connection with the earth, and with older indigenous spiritual understandings from our own heritage and land. And I think that is why many of us, yearning for reconnection and guidance, have sought help from traditions not from our country. It is in this spirit that at the time I looked towards Native American wisdom and traditions, especially as I had spent an important part of my childhood in America.
I am sorry to have found the reference on your website that I am a fraud, and what appear to be contemptuous and verbally violent remarks about me. As part of my own evolution, I have run workshops based on what I had been taught and my level of understanding at the time of your discussion thread. I hope you will see that I have moved on, and that my work and website reflect that.
It is in the nature of the internet that what is written can remain there long after its appropriate shelf life and despite its inaccuracy. Please can I ask your moderators to reconsider whether the comments about me should still be there, connected to my website, email and land address and personal phone number? It invites people to take a hostile stance towards me because of my past, and takes no account of who I have become and I what do now. Is that what your group currently wishes for me?
May I offer my deepest apologies that my activities in 2005 were offensive to some members of your group. I would like to good, and not to do harm. May your traditions flourish, and be honoured fully. I wish you well.
Yours faithfully, Alexander Massey
---------------------
Hello Al – thank you for replying to my email. I really appreciate your taking the time.
I am happy for you to post my previous email to your group. I am cautious about engaging in general dialogue with your group. Timberline Warrior made statements on the forum about me as follows: “actors. That about sums this guy up.” “I'm sorry if anyone gets hurt laughing at his reply [meant ironically]”, and “I'm dying to tear this guy another anal appeture, but he probably wouldn't notice, he spouts s*** at both ends as it is LOLOL”. This does not encourage me to enter into dialogue. When s/he emailed me originally, I replied honestly and informatively. I may have been offering answers that showed my ignorance or inexperience, but rather than talking with me about that and enlightening me, Timberline Warrior chose to write about me in this way, disseminating my contact information and naming me as a ‘plastic shaman’ and a ‘fraud’. The reality was that I needed guidance and information how s/he believed I was causing harm. And, as I said in my previous email, I definitely did not claim to be a shaman and did not allow people to give me that label.
I prefer not to discuss my experience of the teachers I learned from. I can answer only for my own actions – past actions which I regard as naïve rather than intentionally misleading or damaging. In fairness to those I learned from, I would let them answer for themselves to anyone who would wish to question them directly. I do not hold anyone else responsible for any errors of judgment on my part, lack of discernment about teachers, or for any gullibility I might have demonstrated.
You mentioned that the “false versions of ceremonies you once did are no longer on your site”. I would like to clarify a couple of points. I used to include as part of my teachings what I had been taught in the name of “Medicine Wheel teachings from native American tradition” (as your Timberline Warrior quoted me) – but I have not done that for a number of years, and I am sorry that I caused offence through doing so – I am not aware that medicine wheels are a ceremony or practice, but you may be able to correct me on that. I only once claimed to teach a Native American practice or do a ceremony, in a course called ‘Voice Quest’, where I said that we would do a “traditional giveaway ceremony”. That course never ran in the end – perhaps there is some natural justice in that. Incidentally, despite the course title, I never claimed it was a Native American vision quest. I think that the description of me as running “false versions of ceremonies” and Timberline Warrior’s claim that I taught “other NA practices” are inaccurate, as this simply did not happen, and I do not know why anyone in your group is making such inaccurate statements about me.
I have attached relevant promotional material from 2003 and 2005 so that you can see for yourself what I actually claimed. Also, I have attached the information I sent out for a course in 2003 to those who booked onto it. Please note how I wrote about the spiritual aspect of the work:
“The spiritual element is non-religious and non-denominational. People from many different spiritual and religious traditions have been able to engage with this work alongside each other in harmony. In this work, we tap into what is both most personal and most universal. All are welcome, and no 'ism', system of belief or ideology is imposed on those who come. Indeed, it is very much the spirit of this work to be open minded, inclusive and non-judgemental, and to honour connection with spirit in whatever form it is expressed in a person's life.”
I would like to apologise again for the upset I seem to have caused. I was shocked and embarrassed by what was written about me, and am duly chastened. At the same time, I ask that I am represented accurately, and that inaccurate statements are not made about me. I think your members may have been misinformed about what I claimed and the work I was doing at that time. Please would your moderators consider removing from your pubicly accessible page the statements about me on the discussion thread as they are not a true and fair reflection of me now (or then).
I think it is important that your traditions are upheld and respected, and I wish you well. I would like to think that your organisation would not want to allow inaccurate and offensive remarks about me to remain on their website; I find it hard to believe that this would be in tune with their own traditions.
Best wishes, Alexander
