If people posting here don't provide a certain level of evidence for their positions or arguments, it is unreasonable for serious readers to actually take them seriously. If poster is protecting their own identity, as many whistle blowers are concerned about, there is still a need for factual and convincing evidence. In the case of allegedly "forged" tribal enrollment papers, any serious reader might simply call up the tribal office and find out. Then report back to the thread.
So anyone who was attempting to declare his tribal enrollment status was falsified by fake papers being posted, would be easily vindicated by phone, and he really shouldn't worry too much about it. Or, if he were not enrolled, he would be confirmed as faking his enrollment status. Either way, the original poster need not reveal their identity here, just reveal reasonable evidence. Anything less is heresay.
Regarding the overuse of identifying labels — beings like David Yeagley's "Tall Soldier 77" (John Martin) will always reveal there true intelligence number after their name with their constant faux patriotism and alleged service. But the facts speak volumes against what they declare. It may not stop flaming but vigilant striving for the truth and facts is the goal. So thank you one and all, and please keep up the good work! ... Brent Michael Davids
