Chat * Problems? Please contact support at newagefraud dot org
Being new here I wonder if what I say will be a waste of bandwith? Anyway I wonder where we would all be right now if all of lifes experinces was based on what we read in books. I mean realy would we ever truly know what was going on?
There are some things you can learn from books and some things youcan't. Because there are some things you can't, that *doesn't* negatethe value of those things you can. This thread was started by a person "calling herself" a Lenape, butdidn't even know that sweats are a traditional Lenape practice. Sheprefers what she learns from her "elders." So, what did they everteach her about the sweatlodge? *Nothing.* I provided her with along list of sources--from books!--to help her in learning about thesweatlodge usages of "her people." Then, I corrected a misunderstanding about the sweatlodge erected insidethe Big House, by citing the words of a Lenape elder--found in a*book*! Marlene added a very interesting practice of the Innu, recorded in 1633,which, in form, function and language, showed a close parallel to an oldLenape practice. Of course, one would only recognize the parallel ifthey read *books.* Then, those who despise scholarship and book-learning chime in withtheir two cents, adding NOTHING to the discussion but broad, opinionatedgeneralities--proving nothing but their own ignorance concerning thesubject.I'm getting a real sense that many of the members of this NAFPS are,themselves, posers and frauds. People calling themselves "Lenape" and"Cherokee" and other native nationalities regularly exhibit their totalunfamiliarity with anything *real* members of those tribes know. In truth, it's all kind of sad. Now, who wants to add to ourknowledge on Lenape sweats? (That's a rhetorical question. I don'texpect there will be any additions from this assemblage.)