If you don't consider several criminal cases, civil cases, cases in tribal court, and SEC cases and the reams of documentation such cases involved to be evidence, as well as the evidence provided by their own words, then there's probably not much point in talking to you.
On the other hand, you consider your bizarre assertion that a woman resembled a sacred figure out of Lakota tradition to be "evidence." What can anyone say, except your medication needs to be upped.
Your fantasy of yourself and her as James Bond types may amuse some of us, but in my case it leaves me uninterested in something that juvenile. Introduce yourself, provide real evidence, go, or be ignored as you deserve.