Adam I truly meant what I said when I stated you have a lot to learn. The passive aggressiveness of your apology underlines that, as well your (not the board's) focus on P. Scott's physical appearance. There are Natives on this board....not all of us have brown skin, dark eyes and long hair.....a bit presumptious of you to think that we do....let's just leave it at that.
I don't deny you learning about Lakota spirituality. Neither do Lakotas. Like I said, it's not hidden from you and if you wish to learn, then you should consider learning the way they tell you. When their spirituality is removed from its context (i.e. non-Native sundances, P. Scott's 'vision quests') what you end up with is interpretation. If, somehow in your head, you've convinced yourself that Lakota people condone a Christian-like model of prosthelytization of the things they hold most sacred...then you're missing a lot.
You perceive P. Scott one way, however, I see other things. I recent hour long interview posted on youtube by Phillip reveals a lot. It's obvious he's learned some things, but its also obvious he covers up things as well. There's a bit of talking out of both sides of his mouth. One the one hand, early on he warns about lumping Native peoples into one homogenous melting pot of "indigenous" and that's its offensive....then he spends the rest of the interview doing exactly that.
My impression of him is he carries himself like a Native Studies Anthropologist Professor from the 70's/80's who's been adopted....nothing more.
I'd also like to point you to a post of another board member concerning adoption and Lakotas:
http://www.newagefraud.org/smf/index.php?topic=1294.0Posted by earthw7:
"I don't know if this is the area to be put this post but here goes.
The adoption ceremonies of my people the Lakota/Dakota/Nakota are
called Hunka ceremonies.
I would like to explain a little about them.
What they are and what they are NOT.
The adoption ceremonies are a ceremonies to adopt an individual into a family.
When you lose a family member you have the right to adopt a member.
When you are close to a person for a long time you have the right to adopt
them as a member of your family.
This relationship is sarced.
The right as a Hunka relatived are to care for your new family as they care for you.
Now for what they are NOT.
There has never been a person who has been adopted into the Lakota or Dakota or Nakota
Nation. This has not happen in the past nor today.
The Lakota/Dakota/Nakota Nations are in North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, Nebraska,
Minnesota, three Canadain States. in order for a person to be adopted into the nation
it would have to be OKed by all of the nations and bands. I can tell it has never happened.
What right the adoptees Do Not have:
They have No Rights to ceremonies,
They have NO Rights to our stories
They have NO Rights to medicine,
They have No Rights to inherit medicine men names,
They have No Right to names,
They have NO Right to speak for our nations
They have No Right to speak for our governments,
They Have No Rights to speak for the adopted families,
If a person claims to be adopted by the Lakota or Dakota or Nakota
If a person claim to be taught medicine by a Lakota or Dakota or Nakota
Beware"
You have a right to your opinion. But please....don't walk into a room full of Natives and pretend you know more about them then they do. All your talk of reflection should have you reevaluating your overgeneralizations of the board members, others that post here, or the information on these pages. Your last post is full of this type of ignorance....
I mean..." he himself teaches that exactly this kind of effect can occur when one sings the sacred songs illicitly." What the heck are you thinking with a line like that....
Superdog