I know Howard.
I did a two week retreat in the Amazon in 2003. Ayahuasca and huachuma. You all bring up a lot of valid points.
1. But it appears that none of you have ever met him.
2. He is a white man and will continue to be so for the forseeable future. So the question is whether a white man, or woman for that matter, can be involved in peruvian shamanism in a meaningful way.
3. I think about it a lot. I live in Peru about 3 months a year. I see a lot of the questionable type of "vision quest/psychotropic journey tourism happening not just in the Amazon but in Cusco as well. I have to say that compared to most of what I have seen since my 2003 experience, Howard Lawler represents a beacon of respectability and integrity in a vast ocean of charlatans both peruvian and other.
4. Howard's personal connection to his own practice appears to be genuine. His connection to his teachers and Shamans appears to be genuine. He is extremely knowledgeable and shares that knowledge in an unassuming way.
5. He is most valuable as an intermediary between cultures, that of the Shaman and that of the Euro/ American.
6. In the Amazon location he works with the Yahua and Bora tribes. In the past he has successfully fundraised and procured community boats and a medical outpost for more immediate care of malaria and the like.
7. Many tribes members participate in the ceremonies at no cost to them.
8. I feel that my experience with Howard and his shamans gave me a basic grounding in the language, culture and pespective of modern day Ayahuasca shamanism, a point of departure for further exploration.
Hope you don't mind, but I added numbers to your words so it would be clear what points you said that I was answering.
1. This is a common excuse or defense used by exploiters, frauds, or those who have commercialized spiritual traditions, which you are repeating. They make the bizarre claim that you have to have met someone to be able to say if they are not what they claim to be.
By that same standard, no one could criticize any con man or anyone who commercialized any spiritual tradition. A Christian couldn't criticize a department store owner who had commercialized Christmas if they had not met them, for example.
2. It tends to be white outsiders who, so used to race being the standard for everything, want to make race the issue, when the real issue is that they are from outside the culture. Their (and your) attempts to appropriate the cultural traditions alter, damage, or even destroy precisely what you claim to find so valuable.
Hasn't it occurred to you that by bringing huge sums of cash into the picture, offering dozens of kinds of allegedly authentic retreats, and advertising not just on the internet but even peddling his services to "reality" television....
...that practice you claim to value has been greatly altered, crassly, and obviously for huge sums of money?
After all, Lawler's response to criticism was nothing more than a big long winded
sales pitch? Shouldn't that tell you, money is his biggest concern? Not spiritual traditions.
3. That others are even worse isn't much of an excuse.
4. He may appear so to you. But then how much did you actually know?
Were you raised in the culture of tribes who perform ayahuasca ceremonies? Obviously not, or you would not have paid big money for Lawler.
Actual healers in the Amazon have denounced the commercialism and exploitation of Lawler and others like him.
5. "Shaman" is not a culture. It's an outsider's term.
6. This is something I am truly interested in seeing evidence of. Do you have any proof of that, besides your own word, or his?
I also would like to know just what percentage of his huge moneymaking business goes back into the tribes.
7. Oh come on. Do you seriously expect us to believe that tribal members go to an outsider for ceremony?
More likely, they were people who were brought in to convince you of the alleged authenticity of the ceremony. It's quite common for tourists like yourselves to be unable to tell the difference between mestizos and Natives. Many of the alleged "shamans" or curanderos who peddle "spiritual tourism" in Latin America are mestizos passing as Indian.
So they might not have even been tribal members, or at least knowledgable or ethical ones. Unless you know the language and knew people within the community beforehand, how would you even know?
8. In two weeks? That's incredibly naive, not to mention incredibly dangerous.
Would you trust an alleged doctor who said they had taken a two week medical course? Would you trust any kind of medical professional who naively thought two weeks was enough for "grounding"? I wouldn't let someone like that treat my dog or even a pet goldfish.
And again, why do you feel the
need to set yourself up as a white guy becoming an Indian shaman? Why can't outsiders to Native cultures just be satisfied with learning to be a good person?