REH continued:
What were nations are now tribes and are becoming corporations with branding based upon descent. What it has brought us is the Unkten in Oklahoma casinos. We are in the Arts business and know these rules. We elect to keep our spirituality our own and we have registered it with the government. They will authenticate the registration and we like it that way. One of you did make a stupid statement about 501-C-3 religious institutions. All religious institutions have to prove that they are such. Expecially during this touchy tax time. They don't just give them out up here. There are plenty of sophisticated tax lawyers who will take you to court in order not to have to pay more school taxes for their children themselves. Your comments are em-bare-assing.
AL
"Prem Das", a white guy who poses as a Huichol shaman, is another exploiter.
REH:
When I met Matsuwa and spent a whole night in ceremonial with him he had a very smart white guy as his apprentice. He was intelligent, well traveled and very respectful of his teacher of several years. His name was East Indian where he had also studied. He also marketed yarn paintings from Huichol artists at Matsuwa's Rancho. His name was Prem Das. That is all I will say.
AL quotes:
"Chapter Three, The Marketing of Huichol Shamans
American youth, suffering from a crisis of meaning which became especially acute as the credibility of the "establishment" diminished in the mid-1960s, abandoned tangible political objectives to pursue "tales of power," of a "supernatural" sort, disseminated by a disorganized group of collaborators interested in profiting from meeting the unmet demand for gurus and mysticism. The Delgado-Furst-Myerhoff version of Huichol culture was inherited, and is being passed on with little if any modification, by Prem Das, Brant Secunda, and others. Their version of Huichol culture and "shamanism" is the version known to today's New Age consumers.
Like Gordon Wasson, I am outraged by marketers who bastardize ancient rituals and cheapen the tremendous personal sacrifices, unbending dedication, and humility required of bona fide Huichol and Native American healers and ritual specialists (those defined as "shamans"). My admiration for authentic aboriginal American ritual practitioners is what animates my criticism of those who prostitute and trivialize their teachings."
REH:
Al, here's the citation on the net for your quote:
(Carlos Castaneda, Academic Opportunism and the Psychedelic Sixties
Kikes, Jay Courtney (1993)
Victoria, BC: Millenia Press.
ISBN: 0-9696960-0-0 paperback
Description: Paperback, xxviii + 285 pages
Contents: Foreword by Phil C. Weigand, acknowledgements, introduction, prologue, 5 chapters, Appendix A: Peyote: Divine Cactus or Dangerous Drug?, Appendix B: How Maize Was Acquired by Huatacame, Appendix C: Peyote Song, Huichol Glossary, bibliography, index, about the author.
Excerpt(s):
Foreword
by Phil C. Weigand)
http://www.csp.org/chrestomathy/carlos_castaneda.htmlREH:
What is interesting to me as a man of the theater is that Wiegland calls him Jay Fikes but the title calls him "Kikes."
These arguments are like the psycho-analytic arguments of Indians from the 1950s. They were ethnocentric and ultimately genocidal in character. They are also like the arguments against Rodin in Paris by the Academy that caused their students to destroy the first "Thinker" statue.
When we left home to escape such rigidity we weren't the first or the last to elect not to stay and become alcoholics or commit murder or suicide. These academics have an agenda which is to claim that their photographs of the culture are still relevant. All cultures add to their life or they die. They don't only add cars and dishwashers.
continued