Apparently it is time for ME to give an answer as to what I think being NDN is, since all I keep getting on here are bits and pieces, including BASHING of those who can prove their native ancestry, and many other derrogatory comments without getting a full answer.
NO..I do not believe someone of 1/64 or even smaller, can claim to be Native. If they are smaller, and still inter-marries with others that are similar, then they are Metis. If the amount of blood quantum is 10% or higher in an individual, then they are NDN and have the same rights, responsibilities and priveleges as to any other NDN, federal and non-recognized.
Sure, culture, language, land is important, but so is family, and that includes geneology (which is the study of your famliy lineage), and DNA. When DNA matches perfectly with someone's geneology, and can even pinpoint which tribes, that's proof on paper. I learned myself of a deceased friend's adopted parents who did do a DNA, went west to a Federally Recognized tribe, and actually became enrolled because of DNA. DNA is what is distinctive in your blood. Sure, some nutjob labs can only say european or whatever...DNAtribes and one other can literally state, with accuracy (and because they are linked with the Federal govt.) which tribe you are from, and how much percentage you have of whatever genetic code from all over the world.
In the U.S., it is demanded of a person to say what he/she is, whether it is white, black, asian, latino, native american, etc. One cannot pick several, as evident on many forms of documentation, local, state and federal. When I was taught you had to be one or the other, I picked myself to be NDN, because I BELIEVE I am the last one in my family to hold any NDN blood, and that's why I will marry a woman with NDN blood.
And when someone of NDN blood tries to learn everything he can, EVEN when it is out of books because he/she might not be able to go to the village where his/her tribe is, it still makes him NDN. You can't tell Sonny Bearing who lives in Lame Deer, MT, that he's not NDN because he is learning his Cheyenne culture out of a book. He'd protest, show his card, etc, and even someone here said that proof of NDN isn't in a piece of paper. So, even if a person learns out of a book (and I hope it's a book written by an NDN or someone who lived with them), and knows their family heritage, that still makes them NDN.
Pretty much my answer is the same as nighthawk's, and NO, I don't expect for people to twist my words around and start arguing all over. I already heard your answers. If you want, you can either say "I agree" or "I disagree", without giving a lengthy explanation.
Eric