Gee Sizzle...You really don't seem to understand the principles underlaying what people here target and what people here DON'T target, and WHY .
This is just how I understand this, but after participating here for a few years this is what I have noticed...
People who post here don't usually target peoples claims to be of Native descent if this is the only questionable thing they are doing.
First off, as has already been explained to you, as long as people aren't claiming a political identity , whether or not they are enrolled may not be that important in decideing if a person is somehow legitimately connected with a Native community.
While it may be possible to prove whether or not a person is enrolled, even that can be difficult and both sides of a debate on this subject can post scans of letters and documents , but the other side can make equally compelling arguments that all this is fake. Unless you know the people involved, this can be almost impossible to verify one way or another and the fights over this can rage on for years , never getting resolved.
If a person isn't enrolled and claims some Native descent, proving this is non existent can be next to impossible , as the person can always claim their ancestor was wrongly recorded and occaisionally this may be true.
If you want to go after people purely because they claim some unverifiable Native descent , i gotta tell you , even if you could recruit hundreds of people to help you, and you made this your full time job for the next 20 years. and the only progress you are likely to make is creating a lot of angry people and disagreement.
The next problem is that even if someone claims to be of native descent and you do the very intensive and time consuming genealogical research to prove beyond all reasonable doubt the person can not possibly have any substantial amount of native blood, you still haven't proven they are a liar or a bad person because many people were told this by their families, just believed it to be true and were accepted into a native community for decades on this basis. Not everyone who mistakenly claims Native ancestry is a deceptive person.
As I understand it, it is for all these reasosn people who post in NAFPS don't generally worry about validating peoples ancestry unless this is being used to gain public trust.
The works of fiction you have cited in this thread , by David Seals, are works of fiction, and don't really involve "public trust"
The books written by Lynn Andres and carlos Castenada were not presented as works of fiction and both these people also gave workshops based on the allegedly real spiritual teachings presented in these books. That is the difference. it is a subtle distinction, but it is a distinction it would really help you to be able to make.
People who post in NAFPS generally target people who are advertising and charging for Ceremonies , or Spiritual or cultural teachings which the Spiritual authorities of the tribe these cultural practices are maintained by , say should not be commercialized.
Books sold as fiction would not fall in this catagory.
People who post in NAFPS generally target situations where what is being taught as a Native tradition isn't, and the person teaching this just made this up , or has partly made this up.
Books sold as fiction might be offensive but would not usually fall in this catagory.
People who post in NAFPS also target people claiming some sort of position of authority , when this authority is not recognized by the persons claimed Native community.
Writing a book marketed as fiction is not claiming a position of authority.
Also using knowledge of Native ways to obtain sexual favors will get someone criticized here.
People who claim to be a charity serving Native people who may be using too large a portion the funds for personal use , will also sometimes get discussed here.
Peoples personal claims of ancestry , just in themselves, usually aren't questioned unless this is being used to prop up other claims which involve the public trust.
being an author of fictional books does not.
Or would you also go after authors like Tony Hillerman, who's books contain Navajo characters and a fictionalized Navajo culture?
I hope this helps you understand why people here aren't supporting you.
I think there is usually some well thought out reasons and principles behind what we choose to target and what we don't choose to target.
