Hello all. Like Peter Askew, I was alarmed by the negativity surrounding Leo Rutherford. It seems more like a hate/mock-fest...? In case anyone is interested in ensuring a balanced perspective, just to say that Leo has helped two of my relatives with issues very successfully, I have also had personal experience of his help. In all these experiences, Leo has been extremely sensitive and kind. There has never been any hint of commercialisation of what he did for our family, or any other pressure or pretence about his teachings. On the contrary, Leo has very self-deprecating humour. I am also surprised by one comment regarding Leo's gender attitudes: I simply do not recognise this at all, it's as if the discussions on the forum were about a different person. It is true that some group exercises of many kinds (my experience was with Chinese chi sessions) can leave participants in a difficult state, and perhaps women might find that disturbing (incl. me), but that would not necessarily mean that help was needed or that the leaders were uncaring. In any case, just for the avoidance of doubt, I am not connected in any way to Leo, but just really found the balance of the opinions here alarming given my own direct experience. I would wonder whether the forum really seeks a balanced perspective...
With kind regards.