James contacted me perhaps a week ago, saying similar things in some ways, but writing very differently in others.
He insisted that the whole thread is slanderous and it be taken down, no explanation given. But when I asked for proof why, he gave me the same story about Nemesis. I urged him to come here and give evidence and information that she is not a fraud.
Instead, James, what you are doing is arguing for argument's sake. Worse, sometimes you are arrogantly presuming to lecture Native people about Native cultures. So far I've seen very little evidence.
So let's try again. The only thing useful that you've said so far is you are deeply involved in RQM's inner circle, one of her top people. That's one useful piece of information.
How about something else? Can you answer:
What evidence is there that she is who she claims she is? What African communities claim her?
Why is she involved with a number of pay to pray operators, such as those selling ayahuasca?
Why is she herself involved in pay to pray?
And as for the claims about Nemesis, I should point out two obvious things, one that's already been said. Most of the evidence vs RQM comes from her own website, not Nemesis.
Another member of RQM's circle contacted me many times years ago, when this thread was last active. She said she was a woman of African descent living in England. I'm sorry but I don't remember her name. She went to the trouble of tracking down my cell number. That in itself shows a bit of fanaticism, and many would call that an attempt at intimidation.
She called me repeatedly, never talking for less than an hour each time, saying the same points you have. And much like you have, she would harp on the same points and argue for argument's sake. The only reason I didn't hang up on her, much like we are trying to give you a chance to make your case, is:
We want to be sure about the information we post online.
And once in awhile, once we sort through the argumentativeness, both you and she did actually give some information.
So I hope you will set aside your combativeness. It does no one any good. Can you instead answer the questions above?
A final point: It does not matter if someone met RQM. Your crazy standard on that means no one could ever write about an abuser if they had not personally met them. It's nonsense, and close to spamming or trolling.
