She's getting some pretty horrible legal advice from one of the GTIF "ambassadors" called Embassador Ararita....
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.facebook.com/nospmashael"Embassador Ararita: YOU CAN SUE “FOR THE WRIT OF DE NOVA” JUST FOR BEING CORRECT ON THE GRAMMAR
Standing White Buffalo: So on Monday I go to court of queens bench, file a statement of claim, suing "For the writ of denova" on the grounds that I am sovereign?
Embassador Ararita: no file the writ because they are using incorrect grammer
Embassador Ararita: ALL CORRECT GRAMMAR ONLY HAS ONE VERB IN IT
THE AVERAGE SENTENCE WRITTEN BY AN ATTORNEY HAS 3 TO 5 VERBS IN IT
SOME SENTENCES WRITTEN BY ATTORNEYS HAVE ADVERB VERB ADVERB VERB ADVERB VERB
Embassador Ararita: every-time they take you to court file the writ for the same reason because they will never use correct grammar
Standing White Buffalo: Ok, I just finished the first video, I have many more thanks for your help . I'm hoping the Judge understands
Embassador Ararita: oh yea the judge wiill know, but arm yourself with the understanding of David Wynn Miller is saying, .......
Embassador Ararita: WHEN YOU SEPARATE PREPOSITIONS THEY ALL BECOME ADVERBS
WHEN YOU PUT A FACT IN FRONT OF A FACT THE FIRST FACT BECOMES AN ADJECTIVE WHICH CHANGES THE SECOND FACT INTO A PRO NOUN
A SINGLE SYLLABLE MEANS NO"
----------------------------------------------end of quoted material----------------------------------
It continues on...much along the same lines. Some really horrible advice. If she presents this to a court there's no chance she's getting her kids back.
A few notes....Ararita seems to be addressing the "writ of de novo" (not de nova...no such thing). Basically, it's a new trial because of some impropriety in the previous trial. Evidence is presented new as if the previous trial never happened and new evidence can be introduced. But these types of trials are at the discretion of the judge...so it can be denied.
He keeps on ranting about grammar. Apparently, he's under the belief that Child Welfare (or maybe even the government of Canada) is a corporation and believes that subjects them to a Universal Commercial Code for Corporations and one of those codes says you can't change grammar....he also believes the judge thinks he'll be fired for not conforming to this code so he will grant De Novo everytime on the grounds of incorrect grammar....smh...
Hard to say where he's even basing his law interpretations on (US or Canadian laws), but he references writings of David Wynn Miller who is an activist for the Sovereign Citizen Movement. He's been in the news since the Tuscon shooting because the shooter (Jared Lee Loughner) ranted similarly about government and grammar and there are a lot of people who believe Miller's craziness contributed to the spiral that led to the shootings. Miller has come publicly as not knowing Loughner, but he agrees with his sentiments and stated that Loughhner repeated things on youtube that were posted on Miller's own website.
A similar spiral may happen with Sampson....praying GTIF doesn't turn her into a monster by stringing her along like they are. She seems ready to present herself in court on Monday with this nonsense.
Superdog