Author Topic: Chuck Spezzano & Psychology Of Vision  (Read 704572 times)

Offline Sandy S

  • Posts: 361
Re: Chuck Spezzano & Psychology Of Vision
« Reply #465 on: July 16, 2015, 10:50:33 pm »
Nothing At All, pt. 3

Quote
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT
STATE OF HAWAII

STATE OF HAWAII, by MARK E. RECKTENWALD, Director of the Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs, Petitioner.

vs.

CHARLES L. SPEZZANO dba PSYCHOLOGY OF VISION, Respondent.

STATEMENT OF ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF LAW AND REASONS FOR ENTERING INTO CONSENT JUDGMENT

The STATE OF HAWAII, by its Director of the Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs (hereinafter "Petitioner"), by its undersigned attorney, files this Statement of Alleged Violations of Law and Reasons for Entering in Consent Judgment pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statutes (hereinafter "HRS") 480-22.

Here is the text of 480-22--

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 480-22 : Hawaii Statutes - Section 480-22: Judgment in favor of the State as evidence in private action; suspension of limitation.

(a) A final judgment or decree rendered in any civil or criminal proceeding brought by the State under this chapter shall be prima facie evidence against the defendant in any action or proceeding brought by any other party under this chapter, or by the State, county, or any of its political subdivisions or governmental agencies, under section 480-14, against the defendant as to all matters respecting which the judgment or decree would be an estoppel between the parties thereto. This section shall not apply to consent judgments or decrees entered before any complaint has been filed; provided that when a consent judgment or decree is filed, the attorney general shall set forth at the same time the alleged violations and reasons for entering into the consent judgment or decree. No consent judgment or decree that is entered before any complaint has been filed shall become final until sixty days from the filing of the consent judgment or decree or until the final determination of any exceptions filed, as hereinafter provided, whichever is later. During the sixty-day period any interested party covered under section 480-13 may file verified exceptions to the form and substance of the consent judgment or decree, and the court, upon a full hearing thereon may approve, refuse to approve, or may modify the consent judgment or decree.

(b) A plea of nolo contendere and a final judgment or decree rendered pursuant to that plea in any criminal action under this chapter shall not be admissible against the defendant in any action or proceeding brought by any other party under this chapter, or by the State, county, or any of its political subdivisions or governmental agencies, under section 480-14 against the defendant.

(c) Whenever any civil or criminal proceeding is instituted by the State to prevent, restrain, or punish violations of this chapter, but not including an action under section 480-14, the running of the statute of limitations in respect of every private right of action arising under the laws and based in whole or in part on any matter complained of in the proceeding shall be suspended during the pendency thereof and for one year thereafter. [L 1961, c 190, §20; Supp, §205A-20; HRS §480-22; am L 1981, c 181, §1; am L 2001, c 79, §3; am L 2008, c 19, §7]


Back to the main court document--

Quote
A. Statement of Alleged Violations of Law

1. Respondent is a resident of the State of Hawaii.
2. Respondent is not licensed with the DCCA as a psychologist.
3. On or about October 13, 1995, Respondent prepared a report regarding Steven Tipaldi and Sarah Maculum. Petitioner alleges that said report constitutes the practice of psychology and/or the representation of Respondent as a psychologist.
4. Petitioner alleges that respondent, by engaging in the above-described conduct without first obtaining a license to practice psychology from the DCCA, violated HRS 436B-27(B), 465-2, 465-15(a)(1), 465-15(a)(3), 480-2 and 487-13(a).

Here is the text of the statutes cited-

§436B-27  Civil and criminal sanctions for unlicensed activity; fines; injunctive relief; damages; forfeiture.
(b)  Any person, who engages in an activity requiring a license issued by the licensing authority and who fails to obtain the required license, or who uses any word, title, or representation to induce the false belief that the person is licensed to engage in the activity, other than a licensee who inadvertently fails to maintain licensing requirements under the appropriate licensing statute and who subsequently corrects the failure so that there was no lapse in licensure, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and each day of unlicensed activity shall be deemed a separate offense.

§465-2  License required.  Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, it shall be unlawful to represent one's self as a psychologist or engage in the practice of psychology without having first obtained a license as provided in this chapter. [L 1967, c 290, pt of §1; HRS §465-2; am L 1971, c 84, §2; am L 1985, c 115, §4]

§465-15  Prohibited acts; penalties.  (a)  No person shall:
(1)  Use in connection with the person's name any designation tending to imply that the person is a licensed psychologist unless the person is duly licensed and authorized under this chapter;
(3)  Advertise or make a representation, either publicly or privately, as being a psychologist, licensed or otherwise, or as being able to perform professional services described in section 465-1, except as otherwise provided in this chapter, without having a valid unrevoked license or temporary permit issued by the director;

§480-2  Unfair competition, practices, declared unlawful. 
(a)  Unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of any trade or commerce are unlawful.
(b)  In construing this section, the courts and the office of consumer protection shall give due consideration to the rules, regulations, and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission and the federal courts interpreting section 5(a)(1) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 45(a)(1)), as from time to time amended.
(c)  No showing that the proceeding or suit would be in the public interest (as these terms are interpreted under section 5(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act) is necessary in any action brought under this section.
(d)  No person other than a consumer, the attorney general or the director of the office of consumer protection may bring an action based upon unfair or deceptive acts or practices declared unlawful by this section.
(e)  Any person may bring an action based on unfair methods of competition declared unlawful by this section. [L 1965, c 129, pt of §1; Supp, §205A-1.1; HRS §480-2; am L 1987, c 274, §2; am L 1988, c 51, §1; am L 2002, c 229, §2]

§487-13  Unlicensed acts; penalties.  (a)  Any person who furnishes commodities or services for which a license, registration, or certificate is required from the department of commerce and consumer affairs or any board or commission thereunder without having such license, registration, or certificate is engaged in an unlawful act or practice and shall be subject to the penalty provided in subsection (b).
(b)  Any person who engages in an unlawful act or practice as provided in subsection (a) shall be fined by a sum not less than $500 nor more than $2,500 for each unlawful act or practice, which sum shall be collected in a civil suit brought by the office of consumer protection or the department of commerce and consumer affairs.


Let us resume with the court document--

Quote
B. Reasons For Entering Into Consent Judgment

1. Respondent does not admit the allegations of Petitioner set forth in Section A above.
2. Respondent and Petitioner have agreed to a settlement of this matter pursuant to the terms of the attached Consent Judgment as a compromise to avoid litigation and the cost attendant thereto.
3. Restitution is not an issue in this matter.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, APR 30 2004
DENISE P. BALANAY
Attorney for Petitioner

Offline Sandy S

  • Posts: 361
Re: Chuck Spezzano & Psychology Of Vision
« Reply #466 on: July 16, 2015, 10:53:29 pm »
Nothing At All, pt. 4

Quote
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT
STATE OF HAWAII

STATE OF HAWAII, by MARK E. RECKTENWALD, Director of the Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs, Petitioner.

vs.

CHARLES L. SPEZZANO dba PSYCHOLOGY OF VISION, Respondent.

AFFIDAVIT OF CHARLES L. SPEZZANO

STATE OF HAWAII
CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU

I, CHARLES L. SPEZZANO, being first duly sworn upon oath, depose and say that:

1. I have read and understand each of the following documents:
a. Application for Entry of Consent Judgment;
b. Statement of Alleged Violations of Law and Reasons for Entering in Consent Judgment; and
c. Consent Judgment.

2. I understand that I have the right to be represented by legal counsel, and I am represented by Martin Hsia, Esq.

3. After reading the documents set out above, I understand what they mean, and being fully aware of my rights, it is my desire to make this application for Consent Judgment.

Further Affiant sayeth naught.

CHARLES L. SPEZZANO

Subscribed and sworn to before me
this 7th day of April, 2004

TRACY L. NAKOA
Notary Public - State of Hawaii
My commission expires: April 7, 2006

Offline Sandy S

  • Posts: 361
Re: Chuck Spezzano & Psychology Of Vision
« Reply #467 on: July 16, 2015, 10:57:06 pm »
Nothing At All, pt. 5

Quote
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT
STATE OF HAWAII

STATE OF HAWAII, by MARK E. RECKTENWALD, Director of the Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs, Petitioner.

vs.

CHARLES L. SPEZZANO dba PSYCHOLOGY OF VISION, Respondent.

CONSENT JUDGMENT

The STATE OF HAWAII, through its Director of the Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs (hereinafter "Petitioner"), through its undersigned attorney, having filed a Statement of Alleged Violations of Law and Reasons for Entering in Consent Judgment, and the parties hereto having consented to the entry of this Consent Judgment prior to the filing of a Complaint.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT:

1. This Court has jurisdiction of this matter and the parties hereto under Hawaii Revised Statutes (hereinafter "HRS") 436B-27(c), 480-15, 603-21.5(2).
2. Petitioner's Statement of Alleged Violations of Law states a claim upon which relief may be granted under HRS Chapters 436B, 465, 480 and 487.
3. Immediately upon the entry of this Consent Judgment, CHARLES L. SPEZZANO dba PSYCHOLOGY OF VISION (hereinafter "Respondent"), his agents, employees, servants and those in active concert with respondent are enjoined from offering to provide, or providing any services for which a registration is required pursuant to HRS Chapter 465, unless and until Respondent duly registers as a psychologist with the Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs, State of Hawaii.
4. Respondent agrees to pay a civil fine in the amount of FIVE HUNDRED AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($500.00) at the time of execution of this Consent Judgment. Payment shall be made by cashier's check or money order payable to the "DCCA-Compliance Resolution Fund," and delivered or mailed to the Regulated Industries Complaints Office, Attn: DENISE P. BALANAY, Esq., 235 S. Berentania Street, 9th floor, Honolulu, Hawaii 96813.
5. Restitution is not an issue in this action.
6. Under no circumstances shall this Consent Judgment or the name of the State of Hawaii, the Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs, or its employees or subdivisions be used by Respondent in connection with any selling, advertising, or promotion of any product or services.
7. This Consent Judgment shall apply to Respondent, his agents, successors, and assigns.
8. Nothing in this Consent Judgment shall be construed to permit or make lawful any act, practice, or course of conduct prohibited or made unlawful by HRS Chapters 436B, 465, 480 and 487.
9. This Court shall retain jurisdiction of this case, and if it shall be made to appear to the Court that there has been a violation of any of the terms of this Consent Judgment by Respondent, upon petition, this Court may enter an order to show cause why a contempt citation should not be entered.
10. All of the provisions of this Consent Judgment shall become final sixty (60) days from the date of entry of this Consent Judgment, unless during such sixty-day (60) period, any interested party covered under HRS 480-22 has filed verified exceptions to the form or substance thereof. In the event such verified exceptions are filed, the Court, upon a full hearing thereof, may approved or refuse to enter or modify the Consent Judgment.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, May 6, 2004.

Victoria S. Marks
JUDGE OF THE ABOVE-ENTITLED COURT

APPROVED AS TO FORM:
MARTIN E. HSIA
Attorney for Respondent

Offline Sandy S

  • Posts: 361
Re: Chuck Spezzano & Psychology Of Vision
« Reply #468 on: July 16, 2015, 10:59:07 pm »
Nothing At All, pt. 6
 
Quote
DENISE P. BALANAY 5526-0
Regulated Industries Complaints Office
Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs
State of Hawaii
235 South Beretania St., 9th Floor
Honolulu, Hawaii 96813
Telephone: (808) 586-2660

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT
STATE OF HAWAII

STATE OF HAWAII, by MARK E. RECKTENWALD, Director of the Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs, Petitioner.

vs.

CHARLES L. SPEZZANO dba PSYCHOLOGY OF VISION, Respondent.

S.P. NO. 04-1-0153 (VSM) (INJUNCTION)

SATISFACTION OF MONETARY JUDGMENT

Comes now the State of Hawaii, by MARK E. RECKTENWALD, Director of the Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs, through his undersigned attorney, and hereby states and acknowledge satisfaction of the monetary claims embodied in the Consent Judgment filed herein on May 7, 2004, in the amount of FIVE HUNDRED AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($500.00) in civil penalties.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, May 17 2004.

DENISE P. BALANAY
Attorney for Petitioner

Offline Sandy S

  • Posts: 361
Re: Chuck Spezzano & Psychology Of Vision
« Reply #469 on: July 16, 2015, 11:31:56 pm »
Nothing At All, pt. 7

As I prepare comments on these documents I note that Mark E. Recktenwald now serves as the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Hawaii.

It would appear Recktenwald and Balanay thought a justified case existed against SALPOV, and Spezzano refused to defend it in open court. That looks pretty bad for the Respondent. 

So, to my simple layman mind this Consent Judgment avoidance of a trial while not admitting guilt looks to be a close cousin to the plea of "nolo contendere," or "no contest," famously used by alleged bribery recipient US Vice-President Spiro T. Agnew in 1973, who resigned his office in disgrace.

Sure, there could be nuances between these two types of plea bargains I am missing. For one thing, it would seem that by agreeing to a consent judgment, the Court keeps the respondent on a short leash for seemingly an eternity.

In reading the conditions imposed on Spezzano in part 5 of this series I would submit that there have been numerous instances of contempt and violation since 2004. We have already documented several such cases here on NAFPS. 

For openers, as Lenora Kay Spezzano admits in her screed, the very name of the for-profit corporation, "Spezzano and Associates Ltd. Psychology of Vision" suggests that one can expect this company to have real professional psychologists on hand. But not one single person serving on staff or as a trainer is qualified or could be a considered a professional in this field, including the Spezzanos. You would think after a court ruling like this they would change the name of their brand. Even the Honolulu Yellow Pages lists them under "Psychologists."

http://www.yellowpagecity.com/US/HI/Honolulu/Psychologists/Page+4/

How did that happen? It is a fraudulent listing and needs to be removed.

The post-2004 violations fall into three categories.

First, direct deception by Spezzano himself. His Ph.D. degree, as we have demonstrated by reproducing the title page of his thesis (attached), was in the liberal arts style "Professional Psychology" and his dissertation was classified by an academic library as literature rather than science. But in his LinkedIn and own webpage, Spezzano claims his degree was in "Counseling Psychology"--

https://www.linkedin.com/pub/chuck-spezzano/21/4a7/396

http://www.chuckandlencyspezzano.com/ChuckSpezzano.htm

Now I will admit it is possible his diploma and his thesis could have different descriptions of whatever degree he earned, but that would be sort of weird. At any rate, his degree is not accredited by the APA anyway, so it does not really matter.

Spezzano's only post-graduate education was at Oneness University in 2007, and his record of this attendance and how it served as one of his "two greatest inspirations" alongside A Course in Miracles was systematically wiped from all SALPOV controlled websites internationally and Spezzano's LinkedIn profile in the beginning of 2014. This demonstrates that control over foreign SALPOV websites originates in Hawaii. This fact brings us to the second category.

Second, the SALPOV trainers, who are included in the conditions of the Court, also violated the order. For quite some time an official SALPOV website in the United Kingdom called povevents.com, administered by trainer Avril Woodward, claimed that "CHUCK SPEZZANO is one of the world's leading psychologists and experts on relationships and personal growth therapy."

This website, which also advertised Spezzano's personal consultations for over $1100 an hour, was pulled in December 2014. It is hard to believe these online promotions could exist without approval from the Spezzanos given the international uniform deletion of Oneness University mentions.

Images are attached.

Also, Spezzano's Healing Keys co-author, British Columbia resident Janie Ticehurst, who apparently had exclusive posting rights to one of his videos (since deleted from online viewing), described Spezzano as a "psychologist" on her webpage (also deleted, including from Internet Archive!). Her husband Julian, another former SALPOV trainer and the author of her webpage, admitted Chuck was not a psychologist but kept the fabrication up for the public to see anyway for quite some time.

Image attached.

Third, and worst of all, the ripple effect. Uncritical minds will spread the "Spezzano is a psychologist" lie without investigation. Type the query "chuck spezzano" and "psychologist" and then peruse the Net. Spezzano-worshipper Arielle Essex even calls him a "clinical psychologist." Since so many SALPOV wannabe spinoff business enterprises have been created by students of Spezzano, it is to their advantage to claim their mentor is more than he is.

To dismiss all this as "Nothing at all" is deflection and denial. I think the State of Hawaii needs to revisit this case.

Offline Sandy S

  • Posts: 361
Re: Chuck Spezzano & Psychology Of Vision
« Reply #470 on: July 19, 2015, 02:39:39 pm »
As a PS to the last post, I would also invite the reader to Google the terms "Chuck Spezzano" and "psychologe" since much of his marketing is in Central Europe.

Epiphany

  • Guest
Re: Chuck Spezzano & Psychology Of Vision
« Reply #471 on: July 26, 2015, 12:56:12 am »
Last month Chuck Spezzano posted this:

Quote
AGEMAN
AGEMAN (ah gay mann) is the card for today. It is a Japanese word that is slang for a person who through sex brings good luck or to put it as my Japaneses men friends put it, it means "lucky pussy". Today is a day of good luck from sex. Enjoy!!
Posted Yesterday by Chuck Spezzano

Now this:

Quote
SAGEMAN is the card for today. It is a japanese word that means a woman who brings bad luck in sex. It is slang for 'bad luck pussy."Today where we have been touched by this, attracted to this or passing this on, we can be free of it. It is a simple thing to turn our sex life over to Heaven for purifying. This gets rid of the guilt and the attraction to it and thus brings so much more love, meaning and enjoyment to sex. Have a happy day!!!
Posted 5 days ago by Chuck Spezzano

Japanese slang dictionaries online show how derogatory this term is. Chuck Spezzano continues his pattern of aggressive, bullying, sexualized "humor".

 

Offline Sandy S

  • Posts: 361
Re: Chuck Spezzano & Psychology Of Vision
« Reply #472 on: July 28, 2015, 02:37:16 am »
Hmm.
   
Quote
What Is The Nature of The Relationship Between Psychology of Vision And Oneness University?

There is no relationship between the two organizations. Some of us attended healing programs there years ago, but for a number of reasons it felt true to me to distance Psychology of Vision from Oneness U. For about a year after making that decision, I stated in my seminars that I did not recommend that people attend their programs.

Lency Spezzano, The Truth about Chuck And Lency Spezzano And The Psychology of Vision
http://the-truth-about-chuck-and-lency-spezzano.com/what-is-the-nature-of-the-relationship-between-psychology-of-vision-and-oneness-university/

Then how does she explain this?

Quote
Hi everybody, aloha..just back from hawai... has been great...this mastery thing goes on... i am surprised, what happens...feels like miracles... spezzanos got authorized to initiate Oneness Blessing Givers, and we were the first group to receive that honour from spezzanos... title of the seminar was: "restoring guidance" cant help, think, there is lot of guidance all around... wherever you look, even in the last corner of the world, (Hawai!)... so much guidance, helps us to evolve our master piece... mahalo, and merry christmas

Michael Schöffmann
December 20, 2009
POV Salisbury 2009 Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/groups/152822348333/




Offline Sandy S

  • Posts: 361
Re: Chuck Spezzano & Psychology Of Vision
« Reply #473 on: August 01, 2015, 05:51:04 am »
A Filmography of Online Videos Concerning Spezzano and Associates Ltd. Psychology of Vision

Addendum 7


We have three more entries, all of them examples of Chuck Spezzano's efforts to further his for-profit ambitions into the German market.

Chuck Spezzano und Elke Kirchner
Filmed around the spring of 2015. 13:42 minutes.
https://vimeo.com/125750799

This interview was covered by our own Ingeborg in two parts:
http://www.newagefraud.org/smf/index.php?topic=4179.msg40820#msg40820

Anne-Kathrin Koch
Like so many other unqualified Psychology of Vision trainers Koch has started her own SALPOV spinoff commercial enterprise. She recently created some Youtube outreach videos.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJfV7UVmvGmRk4gN-tG-Qtg/videos

Dr. Chuck Spezzano: Partnerschaft und spirituelles Leben
July, 2015
A softball interview by Brita C. Dahlberg with Spezzano that includes Torsten Konrad serving as interpreter, all of which is basically an advertisement for Spezzano's high-fee events. In the course of promoting his upcoming "workshops" Chuck reveals his very traditional view of gender roles in relationships and his view that you are a nobody unless you are in an intimate relationship. The use of humor is discussed in a very humorless way although Spezzano does manage to slip in a lewd joke, one of his trademarks. 35 min.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9zg3t7wDfDE

After watching this entire interview, I think here is where Spezzano's head is stuck, a mindset that existed a half century ago:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZbusN-n8rE

So much for being "cutting edge."

Offline volcano woman

  • Posts: 32
Re: Chuck Spezzano & Psychology Of Vision
« Reply #474 on: August 25, 2015, 03:20:00 pm »
A Filmography of Online Videos Concerning Spezzano and Associates Ltd. Psychology of Vision

Addendum 6


Jordan Kao
Two short videos with music. One presents scenes from a Hawaii training in 2013, including shots of the Spezzano property and "barn." Another visually documents  a 2012 Thailand SALPOV event.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUWljuLJDDQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngsDVyJiFE4

Visionworks for Life
Jeff Allen promotes an upcoming workshop.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ZUjrZSS3UM

Thailand 2012 is a big cash cow! The greed factor for participants is groundbreaking! To hoodwink these many people at once must of boosted chunk and lunacy's sense of self success! :-X

Offline volcano woman

  • Posts: 32
Re: Chuck Spezzano & Psychology Of Vision
« Reply #475 on: August 25, 2015, 03:28:56 pm »
Last month Chuck Spezzano posted this:

Quote
AGEMAN
AGEMAN (ah gay mann) is the card for today. It is a Japanese word that is slang for a person who through sex brings good luck or to put it as my Japaneses men friends put it, it means "lucky pussy". Today is a day of good luck from sex. Enjoy!!
Posted Yesterday by Chuck Spezzano

Now this:

Quote
SAGEMAN is the card for today. It is a japanese word that means a woman who brings bad luck in sex. It is slang for 'bad luck pussy."Today where we have been touched by this, attracted to this or passing this on, we can be free of it. It is a simple thing to turn our sex life over to Heaven for purifying. This gets rid of the guilt and the attraction to it and thus brings so much more love, meaning and enjoyment to sex. Have a happy day!!!
Posted 5 days ago by Chuck Spezzano

Japanese slang dictionaries online show how derogatory this term is. Chuck Spezzano continues his pattern of aggressive, bullying, sexualized "humor".

 
[/quote]Chunk can't help but diminish the female being over and over again! He is all about dominating the female anyway he can and always turns it into a joke and putting it on the female to rise above it. No wonder his haggard looking wife continues to dwindle before our eyes looking more like a worn down exhausted vessel for his further manipulations and mindfucks.

Offline volcano woman

  • Posts: 32
Re: Chuck Spezzano & Psychology Of Vision
« Reply #476 on: August 25, 2015, 03:34:35 pm »
A Filmography of Online Videos Concerning Spezzano and Associates Ltd. Psychology of Vision

Addendum 6


Jordan Kao
Two short videos with music. One presents scenes from a Hawaii training in 2013, including shots of the Spezzano property and "barn." Another visually documents  a 2012 Thailand SALPOV event.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUWljuLJDDQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngsDVyJiFE4

Visionworks for Life
Jeff Allen promotes an upcoming workshop.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ZUjrZSS3UM

Thailand 2012 is a big cash cow! The greed factor for participants is groundbreaking! To hoodwink these many people at once must of boosted chunk and lunacy's sense of self success! :-X
[/color][/color]

Offline volcano woman

  • Posts: 32
Re: Chuck Spezzano & Psychology Of Vision
« Reply #477 on: August 25, 2015, 04:15:25 pm »
Nothing At All, pt. 3

Quote
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT
STATE OF HAWAII

STATE OF HAWAII, by MARK E. RECKTENWALD, Director of the Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs, Petitioner.

vs.

CHARLES L. SPEZZANO dba PSYCHOLOGY OF VISION, Respondent.

STATEMENT OF ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF LAW AND REASONS FOR ENTERING INTO CONSENT JUDGMENT

The STATE OF HAWAII, by its Director of the Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs (hereinafter "Petitioner"), by its undersigned attorney, files this Statement of Alleged Violations of Law and Reasons for Entering in Consent Judgment pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statutes (hereinafter "HRS") 480-22.

Here is the text of 480-22--

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 480-22 : Hawaii Statutes - Section 480-22: Judgment in favor of the State as evidence in private action; suspension of limitation.

(a) A final judgment or decree rendered in any civil or criminal proceeding brought by the State under this chapter shall be prima facie evidence against the defendant in any action or proceeding brought by any other party under this chapter, or by the State, county, or any of its political subdivisions or governmental agencies, under section 480-14, against the defendant as to all matters respecting which the judgment or decree would be an estoppel between the parties thereto. This section shall not apply to consent judgments or decrees entered before any complaint has been filed; provided that when a consent judgment or decree is filed, the attorney general shall set forth at the same time the alleged violations and reasons for entering into the consent judgment or decree. No consent judgment or decree that is entered before any complaint has been filed shall become final until sixty days from the filing of the consent judgment or decree or until the final determination of any exceptions filed, as hereinafter provided, whichever is later. During the sixty-day period any interested party covered under section 480-13 may file verified exceptions to the form and substance of the consent judgment or decree, and the court, upon a full hearing thereon may approve, refuse to approve, or may modify the consent judgment or decree.

(b) A plea of nolo contendere and a final judgment or decree rendered pursuant to that plea in any criminal action under this chapter shall not be admissible against the defendant in any action or proceeding brought by any other party under this chapter, or by the State, county, or any of its political subdivisions or governmental agencies, under section 480-14 against the defendant.

(c) Whenever any civil or criminal proceeding is instituted by the State to prevent, restrain, or punish violations of this chapter, but not including an action under section 480-14, the running of the statute of limitations in respect of every private right of action arising under the laws and based in whole or in part on any matter complained of in the proceeding shall be suspended during the pendency thereof and for one year thereafter. [L 1961, c 190, §20; Supp, §205A-20; HRS §480-22; am L 1981, c 181, §1; am L 2001, c 79, §3; am L 2008, c 19, §7]


Back to the main court document--

Quote
A. Statement of Alleged Violations of Law

1. Respondent is a resident of the State of Hawaii.
2. Respondent is not licensed with the DCCA as a psychologist.
3. On or about October 13, 1995, Respondent prepared a report regarding Steven Tipaldi and Sarah Maculum. Petitioner alleges that said report constitutes the practice of psychology and/or the representation of Respondent as a psychologist.
4. Petitioner alleges that respondent, by engaging in the above-described conduct without first obtaining a license to practice psychology from the DCCA, violated HRS 436B-27(B), 465-2, 465-15(a)(1), 465-15(a)(3), 480-2 and 487-13(a).

Here is the text of the statutes cited-

§436B-27  Civil and criminal sanctions for unlicensed activity; fines; injunctive relief; damages; forfeiture.
(b)  Any person, who engages in an activity requiring a license issued by the licensing authority and who fails to obtain the required license, or who uses any word, title, or representation to induce the false belief that the person is licensed to engage in the activity, other than a licensee who inadvertently fails to maintain licensing requirements under the appropriate licensing statute and who subsequently corrects the failure so that there was no lapse in licensure, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and each day of unlicensed activity shall be deemed a separate offense.

Obviously it has been too profitable for Chunk to be a fake! Why stop now? He can run around the world hoodwinking foreigners with his loaded charged psycho rap. His confession to Rob Smith on APTN Invesitigates in Canada that he is not a psychologist and should logically be followed by removing psychology from his business name and titles and lectures and workshops and most of all from his "advanced trainers". He has literally cloned his followers to live out the lie and fallacy that he and his worn down wife perpetuate.
It is time now for them all to be enjoined from acting in this deceitful manner.
Many participants especially FN believed he was a psychologist because this is how he is presenting himself. All participants should be reimbursed for false presentation and for damages incurred by being subjected to an imposter!

FN funding has been squandered on these endless workshops, steps to leadership courses and training. The "Advanced Trainers" are still worming their way into the FN coffers on reserves in B.C. Canada selling and pushing POV.
 Who is monitoring the innocent victims of today?
Why should this be allowed to continue when it has been established what C & L are really up to?




§465-2  License required.  Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, it shall be unlawful to represent one's self as a psychologist or engage in the practice of psychology without having first obtained a license as provided in this chapter. [L 1967, c 290, pt of §1; HRS §465-2; am L 1971, c 84, §2; am L 1985, c 115, §4]

§465-15  Prohibited acts; penalties.  (a)  No person shall:
(1)  Use in connection with the person's name any designation tending to imply that the person is a licensed psychologist unless the person is duly licensed and authorized under this chapter;
(3)  Advertise or make a representation, either publicly or privately, as being a psychologist, licensed or otherwise, or as being able to perform professional services described in section 465-1, except as otherwise provided in this chapter, without having a valid unrevoked license or temporary permit issued by the director;

§480-2  Unfair competition, practices, declared unlawful. 
(a)  Unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of any trade or commerce are unlawful.
(b)  In construing this section, the courts and the office of consumer protection shall give due consideration to the rules, regulations, and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission and the federal courts interpreting section 5(a)(1) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 45(a)(1)), as from time to time amended.
(c)  No showing that the proceeding or suit would be in the public interest (as these terms are interpreted under section 5(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act) is necessary in any action brought under this section.
(d)  No person other than a consumer, the attorney general or the director of the office of consumer protection may bring an action based upon unfair or deceptive acts or practices declared unlawful by this section.
(e)  Any person may bring an action based on unfair methods of competition declared unlawful by this section. [L 1965, c 129, pt of §1; Supp, §205A-1.1; HRS §480-2; am L 1987, c 274, §2; am L 1988, c 51, §1; am L 2002, c 229, §2]

§487-13  Unlicensed acts; penalties.  (a)  Any person who furnishes commodities or services for which a license, registration, or certificate is required from the department of commerce and consumer affairs or any board or commission thereunder without having such license, registration, or certificate is engaged in an unlawful act or practice and shall be subject to the penalty provided in subsection (b).
(b)  Any person who engages in an unlawful act or practice as provided in subsection (a) shall be fined by a sum not less than $500 nor more than $2,500 for each unlawful act or practice, which sum shall be collected in a civil suit brought by the office of consumer protection or the department of commerce and consumer affairs.


Let us resume with the court document--

Quote
B. Reasons For Entering Into Consent Judgment

1. Respondent does not admit the allegations of Petitioner set forth in Section A above.
2. Respondent and Petitioner have agreed to a settlement of this matter pursuant to the terms of the attached Consent Judgment as a compromise to avoid litigation and the cost attendant thereto.
3. Restitution is not an issue in this matter.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, APR 30 2004
DENISE P. BALANAY
Attorney for Petitioner

Offline volcano woman

  • Posts: 32
Re: Chuck Spezzano & Psychology Of Vision
« Reply #478 on: August 25, 2015, 04:22:24 pm »
A Filmography of Online Videos Concerning Spezzano and Associates Ltd. Psychology of Vision

Addendum 6


Jordan Kao
Two short videos with music. One presents scenes from a Hawaii training in 2013, including shots of the Spezzano property and "barn." Another visually documents  a 2012 Thailand SALPOV event.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUWljuLJDDQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngsDVyJiFE4

Visionworks for Life
Jeff Allen promotes an upcoming workshop.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ZUjrZSS3UM

Thailand 2012 is a big cash cow! The greed factor for participants is groundbreaking! To hoodwink these many people at once must of boosted chunk and lunacy's sense of self success! :-X

Offline Sandy S

  • Posts: 361
Re: Chuck Spezzano & Psychology Of Vision
« Reply #479 on: August 29, 2015, 04:51:49 pm »
New Age Tea Party, pt. 1

Ever since the American mid-term elections were completed in Nov. 2014, the ultra-conservative Tea Party wing of the Republican Party has been in the US media on a daily basis as they attempt to influence the 2016 Presidential election. In my effort to understand the appeal of the Tea Party, it is striking how much in common this movement and their followers have with Spezzano and Associates Ltd. Psychology of Vision (SALPOV), a for-profit corporation. I suppose this premise could be applied to several of the other New Age frauds highlighted in NAFPS. Not so much in content, but in form.

I am aware the Tea Party and New Age movements are actually decentralized entities and the following characterizations will not apply to all who swear allegiance to their creeds. My subjective impressions are based on the dominant voices of those groups and how I define them. My daily dose of news media includes sources representing the entire American political spectrum and my generalizations about the Tea Party are just that-- generalizations. SALPOV is a much smaller group and easier to define, since it is basically a tightly controlled cult designed exclusively to increase the profit margin of Chuck and Lency Spezzano, two New Age grifters. 

Both the Tea Party and SALPOV are supposedly Jesus-based denials of science financially supported by vulnerable, hurt, lonely, angry and frightened people who disdain critical thinking and seek simplistic solutions to complicated problems. Both the Tea Party and SALPOV depend heavily on feeding off of fear, guilt, and greed (i.e., "abundance"). 

At first blush you would think this sounds crazy. Are not many of the followers of the New Age supposed to be into peace, love, and caring for the environmental and spiritual condition of our planet? Chuck Spezzano himself has endorsed the concept that global warming is real. He also praises President Obama. These are hardly the actions of someone who resembles the Tea Party. Right?

Wrong. At least with the Tea Party, what you see is mostly what you get. SALPOV is more devious.

Somewhere along the line around the start of Reaganism, the Spezzanos sold out their benevolent public/private nonprofit sector motives in exchange for the worship of the coin of the realm. Yes, Reaganomics made people do things they might not have done before. I never saw anyone hold up a cardboard sign asking for money until after Ron the Con was elected in 1980. And it was during the time of Reagan, when greed was openly embraced and celebrated at the expense of working people and those in need, that the Spezzano's dropped their altruistic visions like a hot coal and crossed over to the Dark Side.

In many ways, Psychology of Vision is a child of Reaganism in New Age clothing and exists today as some sort of retro holdover. Nancy Reagan even legitimized the use of a psychic and astrologer in determining her public life and possibly influencing Mr. Reagan. Most Americans today would immediately recognize SALPOV as the hokey scam that it is, which might explain why this organization depends so much on Asian and European consumers who might not be clued in to the cultural and historical red flags that are so obvious to the Spezzano's own countrymen. 

I invite you to sit down, get comfortable, and seriously consider my little treatise here. Hopefully anyone thinking about diving into the Spezzano's money trap will read this first and then retreat before investing themselves financially and emotionally into the SALPOV flim-flam.

Jesus:

In the Tea Party, the dividing line between Church and State does not exist. In their view, the United States is a Christian nation with an evangelical Protestant flavor. To them, their interpretation of the Bible is the final word when it comes to law, not the US Constitution.

SALPOV is based on A Course in Miracles (their "greatest inspiration"), which is a text supposedly dictated by Jesus Christ to Helen Schucman from 1965 to 1972. Although SALPOV tries to pass itself off as ecumenical "Oneness," their foundation rests on a copyright free ersatz Christian document of highly doubtful validity. The bottom line is, SALPOV exists on a premise of an interpretation of Jesus via Schucman and as such is a Christian-based cult. Schucman herself supposedly renounced this ACIM nonsense, according to one account. One former SALPOV trainer told me he/she thought the Spezzanos pushed the religion thing too far.

Remember, every time A Course in Miracles is cited by a SALPOV person, they are really, according to their belief, quoting Jesus as channeled by Schucman. Chuck and Lency Spezzano's declarations of allegiance to ACIM is pretty much a house built on sand. 

Sciency:

Tea Party activists tend to disdain the reality of human-caused climate change and they reject the theory of evolution in favor of the Biblical explanation of the creation of humankind. Politicians hoping to pander to Tea Party voters will preface their climate change remarks with "I'm not a scientist, but ..."

SALPOV, like a lot of other New Ager commercial profit-oriented businesses, has no problem with the denial of science (as will become more evident in the course of this post). However, they are not above cherry-picking certain terms in the scientific world in order to bamboozle the innocent. They appropriate concepts in science in much the same way they steal sacred beliefs from Hawaiian or First Nations cultures. Any sentence they or their followers use with the word "quantum" is a good example.

The following video really sums it up and is so dead-on when you apply the message to SALPOV and their worshippers: 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CD8HeoZF9cM

Angry, Hurt, Damaged People:

Happy, secure, serene well-adjusted folks do not sign up for the Tea Party or SALPOV. Both entities are fed by pain and unrest. The difference is that the Tea Party blames the outside world (anger), while SALPOV blames the victim (guilt).

Just look at the SALPOV testimonials-- everyone who paid the massive amounts of money required for SALPOV training started off as a self-professed vulnerable and screwed-up person, leading an unhappy existence. They allowed the SALPOV cult to define them, since individualism is considered to be a negative trait in their universe. Both movements invite the emotionally or politically disenfranchised to lose themselves as part of a bigger cause. In SALPOV, the main cause is padding the Spezzano bank account.

2012:

Whether it is the Rapture or the Mayan calendar, both movements bought into the idea that we are in some sort of endtime transition. Some home-schooled Tea Party kids I know told me they would never get a chance to drive a car because the world was going to end before they would have an opportunity to get a driver's license.

OK, I remember being a kid during the Cuban Missile Crisis and thinking the same thing-- but that was over a half century ago. And it wasn't about any "rapture," it was about real Soviet missiles.

Spezzano's little monthly letters, when read back to back, really whip up the fear factor in order to keep the flock in line, much in the same apocalyptic tone of the Tea Party. "Dodged a bullet" was a fave expression of his. Now that we are safely in 2015 I notice he has toned down his act. The predicted 2012 silliness didn't happen, I guess.

Spezzano stopped offering his monthly words of wisdom in English on his own website well over a year ago and now only releases these spiritual tidbits in German, for Central Europe is still proving to be a lucrative hunting ground for this American predator. English speakers have apparently started to wise up about his scam and that market is drying up.

PC Backlash:

Donald Trump has recently been very public in his disapproval of "political correctness." It turns out Chuck Spezzano agrees with him:

Quote
HEALING THE HIEROPHANT is the card for today. The hierophant signifies religiosity and empty form without spirit. As such it is political correctness rather than authentic action or true being. Healing this today helps us act truly rather than just going through the motions. Have a freeing day!
Posted 25th December 2011 by Chuck Spezzano

http://chuckandlencyspezzano.blogspot.com/2011/12/healing-heirophant.html?q=correctness

and

Quote
HEALING THE SHADOW FIGURE OF THE CHARLATAN is the card for today. The feeling of being a fraud is a common experience as one reaches the area of the Dead Zone and we begin to heal the roles in our lives most of which we have been carrying since we were children. This brings authenticity and a new connectedness in relationships. A shadow is a part of us we judged, split off, typically repressed and projected out. The CHARLATAN is an attempt to fool others to get what we want such as sex, money and inclusion but any role can give us this feeling especially political correctness. Have a good day!
Posted 18th January 2013 by Chuck Spezzano

http://chuckandlencyspezzano.blogspot.com/2013/01/healing-shadow-figure-of-charlatan-is.html?q=correctness

and

Chuck Spezzano, April 2004. This one seems a bit discombobulated:

Quote
Fear dictates sameness, a return to routine or a regression. Awareness calls for a significant step forward into a new way, one which naturally generates a new flow. When there is fear at the root, you start living by form instead of the spirit. This is the inauthenticity of political correctness America is so busy being proud of its pioneer roots that it’s stopped being a pioneer. The Republicans that believe the American pioneer spirit will come from building an American Empire are sadly out of step with the times. The pioneering that is to occur now is meant to be a change of consciousness that will reflect new levels of partnership and empowerment worldwide. That is what occurs after the Dead Zone stage if there is success. This alone shows the United States’ regression and move to war under the Republicans as a failure in leadership. It is the same thing a couple does when they fail to make the leap to partnership in the Dead Zone; they regress into fighting to try to bring some aliveness back to the relationship. They are frightened to face the deadness and move through into partnership.

http://www.newciv.org/nl/newslog.php/_v76/__show_article/_a000076-000084.htm

This is so drenched in irony, excuse me while I wipe my glasses.

So what happened to Chuck to make him so reactionary to the concept of political correctness? Certainly even mainstream Americans have a problem with some aspects of how this term has been applied, but Spezzano really goes out of his way to slam it. Interesting.

Us vs. Them:

Both the Tea Party and SALPOV have a strong "us vs. them" mentality and possess strict litmus tests for who is worthy of respect. "Sheeple" and "Libtards" are common dehumanizing terms in the Tea Party to describe those who do not agree with their dogma. SALPOV considers us critics to be cyber-bullies and trolls. Both groups would count me as a "hater," a rather tiresome phrase used to cut off dialogue when uncomfortable facts are raised.

SALPOV divides the world population into the "enlightened" and "unenlightened" according to one SALPOV member who corresponded with me. Since I dared to ask some questions I was obviously unenlightened. But here's the deal on that. I strive to be enlightened in the true sense of the word. In history the Age of Enlightenment was a big party celebrating reason, critical thinking, and creative expression of individualism. These are all traits the Spezzanos look down upon. SALPOV has about as much right to claim "enlightenment" as an exclusive term as the Tea Party does in saying they are the only "patriots."

More detail on this topic:

http://www.newagefraud.org/smf/index.php?PHPSESSID=dcd368nll9kh9i4mvokveivv80&topic=4179.msg37731#msg37731

Racism:

That the Tea Party is a racist movement hardly needs any elaboration from me. Donald Trump is doing an effective job of tapping into that xenophobic, nationalistic fear-based part of the American voting public so far. I will give Trump his due. He is saying out loud what most Republicans will only say to each other in private. Tea Party type racism is pretty much out there in the open.   

SALPOV's racism is more subtle. They buy into the Louise Hay model of past-life justice, which means entire civilizations, such as Hawaiians, First Nations, and Jews deserved the genocidal treatment they got due to their own past sins. Hay even admitted this during an interview (documented on this forum). We have statements from Lency Spezzano justifying the SALPOV psychocolonization of Haida Gwaii and her description of Asian followers as not advanced enough for her sophisticated Western teachings. Section K of the German language Psychology of Vision Trainers Manual is basically a very condescending and cynical recipe for affinity fraud upon First Nations.

In Lency's "Original Mind" video (now deleted from public view) the manipulation and use of people as props is very evident. Here's a transcript:

http://www.newagefraud.org/smf/index.php?topic=4179.msg39666#msg39666

The Chuck Spezzano/Janie Ticehurst "Healing Metaphors" (new deleted from online view) has a roundabout relationship here, equating various congenital disorders with being a bad person. Using the Hay model, genetic birth problems such as Down's Syndrome were blamed on unresolved problems from a past life:

Quote
Down's Syndrome

Down’s syndrome is a congenital abnormality (one that is present at birth). It is the result of having an extra chromosome in our genetic make-up, usually number 21 or 22.

Down’s causes moderate to severe mental retardation, oriental appearance of eyes, flat nose or absent bridge of nose, a single palmer [sic] crease on a short broad hand and a dwarfed body.

If we have Down’s syndrome, it means that we have come to learn some lessons at a soul level. We are here to seek soul fulfillment and the completion of a cycle, yet we are stuck in the transition between the old level and the new.

The two main soul lessons of Down’s syndrome are correcting over-willfulness and giving up the ego’s plan in exchange for heaven’s plan.

Notice the use of "oriental." Not the preferred nomenclature. Maybe outside complaints on the "Healing Keys" is one reason why Spezzano hates "political correctness" so much.