Ok, let's do that.
One of the questions I had was "what is your tribal affiliation"? Reason I ask I dont see an "About" and I was just wondering.
I would ask your blood quantum, as it states on your CDIB Card, but I note that you posted the annotation that ethnicity does not matter. so I have a question.
How do you reconcile that with the fact that certain groups (Indians) require ethnicity through a specific blood quantum. Which is completely unscientific? Others are kicking out or attempting to, tribal members because of their ethnicity. (I follow the Court cases). While I sat in on a speech by a senior tribal member of a certain tribe a couple of months ago, and when asked by a non affiliated Indian what his blood quantum was he could not answer. Because about everyone in that room knew, zero. And the historical rundown given was not accurate but rather revised to fit a specific narrative and can easily be proven by Legislative Minutes and Court cases between 1800 and 1903. How do you reconcile all of these things when determining who to call out?
Do you think that a Civil Rights attorney and the ACLU might consider these things? What about the Courts? What about a certain group that is asking for the Tribal Rolls to be reviewed and corrected through the BIA because they are Indians, with paperwork from the BIA, while non Indians are being taken care of and they are not? And if their spouses happen to be non Indians, they dont count. So how does ethnicity not count? And it isnt necesary to say "Because they werent born there". Because that is not a prerequisite.
What do you say when people who know, see the argument over the NAGPRA then see a certain group decide to dig up an Indian cemetery to do a Casino expansion? What do you say to the people who see the elderly Indian nearly crying because those you have determined to be real Indians are willing to dig up his ancestors for some extra pavement?
What I would like to see is an absolutely clear outline of what someone considers an Indian. Because I know what Tribal Leaders and Archeologists agreed on back in the 1990's. Or does that just get adjusted to fit whichever narrative that it needs to fit?
I am very curious concerning the correct answers to all of these questions. What is it that YOU PERSONALLY decide makes someone an "Indian" and are you so confident in your interpretation of the rules and laws that you would be willing to argue the point with a Civil Rights attorney.
Not saying that any of that "Is". I am however, curious to know what the answers are. Because there are about a ton more things that are entirely opposing when it comes to these laws, regulations, BIA rules and tribals rules. That goes without saying. But I'm going to say them anyway.