William Jervis started to post comments on a German-speaking forum. As usual, he used different names. I chose an unusual way to try to communicate with him. It's obvious that he is lying most of the time, but unfortunately the people who worked together with him and made the whole tour possible are not aware of this. We were criticized for not communicating with him and Sabine Böhler directly, so I had to do something about it.
Ah so. Thanks for clarifying, finally, that the ominous person(s) urging you to contact Jervis and talk to him and Böhler aren't Native Americans, but white German nuagers. Your comments in the German-language forum were somewhat ambiguous in this respect, and some of your readers there seem to have misunderstood who it may have been to exert such a pressure.
It is perhaps a platitude that it isn't possible to please everyone and that attempts at trying most certainly will result in a failure. Of course died-in-the-wool Nuagers will be hard pressed to see what Jervis is doing is wrong and why. There will always be persons who are dead-certain Jervis is native, an enrolled member of the Cherokee, and a medicine person of utmost fame. This cannot be helped – at least not unless these persons are willing to listen and learn.
Direct discussions with Jervis, no matter whether in person or per mail, can only enhance Jervis' status – and he certainly will use and exploit such efforts for his profit.
But to give in to demands of direct communication with someone who has just gone out of his way to defame a person – worldwide!, since it was done online – as a ho and as his ditched former sexual partner is, sorry, an idiocy.
Unfortunately, a German forum member made this an issue and he started a discussion. His rude comments led to the point where we decided to withdraw from that forum, because it did not make any sense anymore. I had started several threads in order to inform the public about Jervis fraudulent activities.
So there was some criticism voiced in the German-language forum, and this wasn't restricted to only one person. Criticism was raised e.g. regarding entering discussions with Jervis, or regarding the number of posts dumped by certain persons (after Jervis has been actively selling ceremony for some 10 years, everybody by now is aware he tends to overdo and publish a multitude of contributions, but one does not necessarily have to copy such a behaviour), or the number of new threads opened up to discuss Jervis and his activities.
In that German-language forum, you also posted a contribution today (i.e. Sunday, July 17) saying you did not feel safe in that forum any longer (you indeed spoke about yourself, not about any 'we') and needed a moderated forum to post. So what was the real reason then – not feeling safe or a few rude remarks (which weren't all that rude, I heard worse in that forum from miffed Nuagers) ?
And why are we given different reasons in different forums in the first place?
Informing the public about Jervis: great new idea.
Speaking about questions: to my surprise, I saw that your campaign group at FB promoted the blog/FB group „Awakening the Horse People“ on several occasions (i.e. April 19, July 10, July 13). Quite incidentially, that blog and group is maintained by a Euro-American person posing as indigenous. Her real-life name is Naomi Archer, although she has been posing not only as indigenous American, but also „indigenous European“ with the names of „Ana Oya Ametz“ and „Ana Oian Amets“. NAFPS has got threads on her already:
http://www.newagefraud.org/smf/index.php?topic=1383.0http://www.newagefraud.org/smf/index.php?topic=2278.0Archer also poses as an alleged indigenous Euro shame-on, has sold seminars and ceremony in the USA and in Europe. Since she registered at the NAFPS boards, she has an intro thread in which she claimed that, as an indigenous European, she would experience a similar oppression as indigenous persons and peoples in the Americas. This of course does not hold any water, never did and never will. All it boils down to is that Archer uses and exploits her different contacts to promote and brush up her pseudo-historic fantasies regarding an alleged pre-Indo-European ancestry she means to „re-awaken“, particularly for paying clients in the US and in Europe who feel an urge to discover real or alleged roots.
So why is a campaign allegedly aiming at providing facts and information on plastic shame-ons offering material written by a plastic ad also promoting a plastic?
